Priority should be given to,
. . . “clean coal and carbon capture and storage (CCS) and onshore gas (CSG)”,
. . . (implying that renewables were neither affordable or reliable).
Further “The next incarnation of our energy policy should be technology agnostic,
. . . it’s security and cost that matter,
. . . not how you deliver it.
Policy should be ‘all of the above technologies’ working together,
. . . to meet the trifecta of secure and affordable power,
. . . while meeting our (substantial) emission reduction commitments”.
2-28-2017 Source: What could possibly go wrong?
| Create a Free Account or Sign In to connect and share in green living and alternative energy forum discussions. |
1
What could possibly go wrong?
Started by eds, Feb 28 2017 12:43 PM
1 reply to this topic
#2
Posted 03 March 2017 - 04:40 PM
trump and his administration are so embroiled in corruption and scandal that they won't get anything done.
(Poor babies-coal miners. I guess they better go back to school while this administration has their meltdown)
(Poor babies-coal miners. I guess they better go back to school while this administration has their meltdown)
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users