eds, on 17 July 2014 - 06:09 AM, said:
From your link:
. . . severely devastated by an 8.9 magnitude earthquake and
. . . a subsequent tsunami in March 2011, and
. . . still only, relative, simply, toxic industrial wastes . . . technically.
The disaster resulted in over 19,000 of deaths, according to the World Nuclear Association,
- Nuclear power is the only large-scale energy-producing technology which takes full responsibility for all its wastes and fully costs this into the product.
- The amount of radioactive wastes is very small relative to wastes produced by fossil fuel electricity generation.
- Used nuclear fuel may be treated as a resource or simply as a waste.
- Nuclear wastes are neither particularly hazardous nor hard to manage relative to other toxic industrial wastes.
- Safe methods for the final disposal of high-level radioactive waste are technically proven; the international consensus is that this should be geological disposal.
. . . severely devastated by an 8.9 magnitude earthquake and
. . . a subsequent tsunami in March 2011, and
. . . still only, relative, simply, toxic industrial wastes . . . technically.
The disaster resulted in over 19,000 of deaths, according to the World Nuclear Association,
And not one of which was a result of the nuclear accident.