Create a Free Account or Sign In to connect and share in green living and alternative energy forum discussions. |


Greenest cars
#1
Posted 09 February 2012 - 11:38 AM
I hadn't even heard of some of these and there's talk of one missing from the list, the Chevrolet Volt, but that's because the council says heavier cars cause more waste in production, and the Volt is too heavy.
http://money.cnn.com...e-greenest-cars
(And I'm not affiliated with CNN Money at all (I wish!), so I'm not gaining anything by linking to them...it's just a good write-up of the cars ACEEE listed)
#2
Posted 09 February 2012 - 12:38 PM
#3
Posted 10 February 2012 - 12:33 AM
I have an 8 year old Ford Fiesta deisel with a tiptronic gearbox (hope I got that right - I don't do technology). I can easily get 60 - 70 mph out of it, so in my opinion, it's at least as green as some of the cars on that list in terms of fuel consumption, although it may not be green in other criteria. At least I can afford it, though.
#4
Posted 25 April 2012 - 09:43 AM
#5
Posted 26 April 2012 - 05:15 AM

I will stick on using the public transport vehicles as there are plenty here. And still walking those short distance or distances that I can manage to walk is better than the greenest cars ever invented. LOL
#6
Posted 14 May 2012 - 02:50 PM
#7
Posted 14 May 2012 - 04:13 PM
#8
Posted 14 May 2012 - 06:26 PM
#9
Posted 15 May 2012 - 08:11 AM
#10
Posted 16 May 2012 - 11:13 AM
SpiroFlo, on 15 May 2012 - 08:11 AM, said:
Both the Karma and the Roadster prove that an electric car can look very cool.

Roadster:

Karma:

#11
Posted 17 May 2012 - 05:03 PM
Toyota Camry Hybrid LE, or the Roadster that dissn_it linked above if I had the money, but they simply cost to much, another reason I believe people don't buy them. I believe the government should have waited a bit until they started "Cash for Clunkers", but nevertheless the project still worked out great I believe.
#12
Posted 17 May 2012 - 06:22 PM
#13
Posted 18 May 2012 - 05:26 PM
Not made out of coal.
I'm not an expert on this, but not made out of coal. The stuff of coal isn't the stuff of batteries, by and large. Coal is mostly carbon, batteries aren't. Really basic chemistry. Really basic.
Batteries do take a lot of energy to produce though, mining the raw materials, processing the raw materials to metals, fabrication and so on. In today's world almost all that energy will come from fossil fuels, got to run all those mining machines, run the ore processors, run the factories. Will take the energy from some combination of coal and petroleum and natural gas to produce the batteries.
Does producing a hybrid like a Prius have a greater environmental impact than a similar conventional auto? I'd guess so. A hybrid has pretty much all the stuff that a regular auto has, plus the added battery and electric drivetrain. Does producing and driving a hybrid a greater impact? No, not if it is driven very much. Some environmental loss to build, that loss gained back and more in the reduced gasoline consumption.
#15
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users